Powered by WebAds

Friday, March 09, 2007

Orthomom Lawsuit Update

Steven I. Weiss posts an update on the Greenbaum/Google/Orthomom lawsuit, with lots of goodies included. Don't miss it - and I'll have much more in the way of comment after Shabbat. To all my readers: Shabbat Shalom and have a great weekend.

16 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me that Orthomom is sweating the lawsuit a bit..huh??

10:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hope Pam is saving up her pennies. She's likely to get hit with paying attorney's fees for Orthomom, not to mention her own. Meanwhile, Pam comes across as someone who has no clue about the law or how to interact with the very community she was elected to represent.

See you in May Pam.

3:46 PM  
Blogger YMedad said...

Anon. 10:17 - Sweating? Boy have you got it wrong.

But as for Canonist's comment on the Latin, I found this: Pro se is a Latin adjective meaning "for self", that is applied to someone who represents himself (or herself) without a lawyer in a court proceeding, whether as a defendant or a plaintiff and whether the matter is civil or criminal.

6:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

did you catch the e-mails between feder and levy? feder seems like a jerk and a half. either that or he's "smelling fear".

8:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Watch--Greenbaum will end up suing Feder for malpractice!

9:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

lol. From the looks of it, she would have quite the malpractice case.

10:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought this case was supposed to be dismissed. And what happened, did the judge order something or not?

10:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

" Anonymous said...

I thought this case was supposed to be dismissed. And what happened, did the judge order something or not? "

Read the papers. It couldn't have been dismissed yet. The judge hadn't even looked at the case when it came before her last month. And it appears from the judge's stip that all she ordered was for OM to be notified and heard before the April 5 court date. It appears to me that Feder and Pam were looking to pull a fast one here. They somehow thought that the judge would look at this and order Google to finger OM, and that Google would do so without notifying OM. You can see that by the fact that they didn't inform OM of their intention to sue. Interestingly, if you look at the website OM links here, the blogger (Weiss) posts a threat from someone who asks him to take down a certain (unrelated) post or else face a libel suit. It seems me that had Pam done this first, she wouldn't look quite as bad as she does now. Instead of looking as if she actually cares about redress or harm, she looks like she is misusing the court as her personal private eye, hoping simply to find out OM's identity. Everyone knows the libel charge has zero merit. This is called a SLAPP suit. What Feder/Greenbaum probably did not anticipate is OM getting a lawyer who specializes in this, and who (from my google searches) seems to have a perfect record on this subject of first amendment protection. Anyone know if Feder's record is as good? Or even good?

10:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My question, Rebbe, was did the Court give Attorney Levy the relief he requested in his letter?

5:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can someone please explain, in simple English, what Levy is asking for, and why Feder is refusing? I didn't understand the legalese very well.

6:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

what happened to the Jersey comment????
sweating???
HMMMM

6:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So...since Mr. Feder can't very well argue the merits of his case (the case has none), he's resorting to making travel arrangements for the opposing attorney as inconvenient as possible. Wasting everyone's time and such. Classy, huh?

Hang in there, Orthomom. Pamela is nuts. Mr. Feder doesn't sound like much of an attorney either. I suspect that he's way in over his head.

10:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

All of you jailhouse lawyers make me sick.

4:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

NY is an anti-SLAPP State. Can you file against her and still remain incognito?

It would deter other abusers of the First Amendment.

10:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

home made energy -
how to break 80 -
hyper vre -
instant domain cash -
i software tv -
jamo rama acoustic -
linden method -
lose the back pain -
magni work -
maternityacupressure -
maternity acupressure -
musclegainingsecrets -
muscle gaining secrets -
negative calorie diet -
one minute cure -
one week marketing -
only 4 gamers -
paid surveys online -
panic away -
pc on point -
pc tv 4 me -
perfect optimizer -
phone number scan -
pick the gender of your bady -
power 4 home -
profit lance -
public records pro -
quantum mind power -
quit smoking today -
recipe secrets -
reg clean -
regi cleanse -
registry easy -
registry winner -

10:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

reg sweep -
reverse mobile -
reverse phone detective -
revolutioniz -
richard markenzie direct -
sale hoo -
simple php -
smtp 2 go -
spyware nuker -
surveys 4 checks -
tax liens made easy -
the bad breath report -
thedietsolutionprogram -
the diet solution program -
the handcrafters companion -
the retired millionaire -
the super mind evolution system -
truth about abs -
truth about diets -
turbulence training -
ultimate content creator -
video piggy -
vincedelmontefitness -
vince del monte fitness -
viral tweets -
warp speed fat loss -
webstigate -
win clear -
win spy -
worlds best compost -
xp repair pro -
yeast infection no more -
your approved -

10:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home